by clicking the arrows at the side of the page, or by using the toolbar.
by clicking anywhere on the page.
by dragging the page around when zoomed in.
by clicking anywhere on the page when zoomed in.
web sites or send emails by clicking on hyperlinks.
Email this page to a friend
Search this issue
Index - jump to page or section
Archive - view past issues
GP Week : Issue 133
Now called FanVision, the new G3 is available for sale with our best experience ever, including an ultra-bright 4.3 inch LCD screen, the ultimate in personalisation, more data, stats and camera angles than anywhere else. Our classic version is still available for weekend rentals. Experience Formula 1TM like never before. Save 20% when you reserve online! F1.FanVision.com There have been big changes at Kangaroo TV. YOUR RACE, YOUR WAY Get the next generation in fan enhancement. Click HERE to go to Monza is the only ultra-fast circuit of the whole championship, and it requires a particular one-off aero package. In reality the previous race in Spa has some common elements with the Italian one, in terms of long straight. For this reason we have to say that many teams used Spa as a sort of test bench, in practice, to test the aero developments that were due to be introduced in Monza. This in fact was the case for Ferrari. The Italian team had for long time planned an huge aero development for the Belgian GP, also keeping the new rear suspension introduced at Silverstone. After the first practice, back-to-back comparison showed the new package to be not so competitive as expected, hence Ferrari decided to not use it, going back to the previous one, with a standard rear suspension. In Monza, the Italian team, had the Spa package working properly, and was pretty confident of achieving a good race pace and even a single lap performance. In other words, the performance shown in Monza was exactly the maximum possible with a mix of old aero package and specific refinements to cope with the low downforce configuration . The car sported a revised rear wing that featured revised endplates. Due to the fact that the main profile has an higher position in Monza, these featured only two slits instead of the standard three used in the previous race. Furthermore, the lower profile was no longer straight, instead featured a sinuous layout. These elements helped in terms of reducing the drag on the long straights. Another team that was particularly active in terms of aero development was Red Bull. The Milton Keynes-based outfit continued with its Belgium –introduced ‘recovery package’, designed during the summer break, that resulted particularly efficient in Monza. Monza was not expected to be the best track for the RB7, but they were able to overcome this problem, with introduction of a revised front wing sporting two additional winglets – not important in terms of additional downforce, but more crucial in terms of flow management towards the rear wing. In this way they were able to reduce the drag on the long straights even when the DRS was not activated. Mercedes too also brought a Monza- specific package, keeping the momentum in terms of aero development since Spa. The front wing introduced in Belgium was deeply revised for Monza, keeping some common points with the previous version. The additional upper profile over the main one featured a single element instead of the two seen in Belgium, plus the main flap now returned to a standard adjustment system with the flap sporting a triangular extension towards the rear edge. This solution was coupled with a low-downforce configuration of the rear wing featuring a very narrow chord main profile. Technical Update: Italian GP The super-high-speed Monza circuit requires a unique set-up, as GPWEEK Technical Editor Paolo Filisetti explains 14